We are being maneuvered so perfectly into socialism and favoring government control over us. Here is Bill Gates on climate change. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/1027/Bill-Gates-just-endorsed-socialism-sort-of-A-boost-for-Bernie-Sanders

Do you know why climate change is happening? All of the inventions counter to climate change are suppressed. Free Energy, power from water-hydrogen, even solar is becoming suppressed. If we lived in a true market based economy these inventions would surpass what is available on the market, but we live in a Corporate Communistic mafia driven economy where thugs will track and hurt you if you build these devises. They will sabotage your research, you will have wonderful workers come in and implant you as Bob Boyce did. They will do anything to stop the individual from owning their basic needs, and now they are trying to con us into socialism.

Isn't it interesting how Russia is so victorious against the terrorists, and our foreign policy is so confused. Why? We didn't prosecute the Bush Administration. It goes on each day and more criminality continues at the behest of these Corporate Communists who extract viscous substances that potentially embolden climate change hmmm what a concept. Now they have maneuvered us so well into accepting that the individual is so lost that the individual must give up his or her rights to government control because, in reality, the government refuses to prosecute criminals - everything from banksters, fraudsters and war criminals. The government is to blame here. There is no recourse for any of the higher ups crimes - illegal wars, torture, false flag revolutions with our tax dollars. We made such a big deal over Nicaragua back in the 1980'? How about Ukraine and the $5 Billion spent there for regime change. There should have been at least an inquiry. These people should be at least questioned. How about the torture, Guantanamo, extraordinary rendition? What about the financial crimes that caused the crash, fraud, extortion, etc?

Without recourse for the American public including prosecutions and regulating corporations, we may now potentially pay their price and give them even more. People get thrown in jail for crimes like they have committed - murder, fraud, etc. People get one vote and have a maximum campaign contribution. Let's say everyone has $2,500 with no PACS. That's it and all. No vote for corps because can they physically cast even an electronic ballot, are they breathing? No. It is simple. No one in politics has cared for the rights of the individual. And now look what they are using criminality to create. People can say socialism is great. Fine. Individuals would function as well or better with a functional government that is able top provide its citizens with recourse. Ever wonder why every one is so complicit in the crimes from foreign governments to powerful people, you guessed it socialism and control of the right of the individual. No one wanted prosecutions. They benefited because there were none. So here we sit, lauding Russia for a fight against terrorists Bush helped to create with his illegal wars based on lies and a publicly disclosed agenda - the Project for a New American Century. Wealthy people are not stupid. They knew all along. Isn't that called being an accessory to a crime?

It was amazing how repulsive this could be to watch our President humiliate himself in front of the world leaders who for the most part are probably aware of this information found here in Veterans Today, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/09/28/obama-goes-potty-at-un/.

Knowing that our population represents approximately 4.49% of the world's population and that we had a chance back in 2000 to be a bringer of peace and prosperity, yet because of the coup by Bush we may ultimately be made to feel what an ignorant, service based economy to developing countries feels like.

When listening to Dilma Rousseff from Brazil and XI Jinping from China, you can see the world that they want to create. It is clear we are not able to fit into that Sustainable Development model through our policies for oil and gas versus green, circular, natural technology and our exceptionalist militarism, as well as our inability to examine our role in the Middle East, truthfully. This will be our downfall, and it is sad that the majority of our citizens have been played along with our President who refuses to take an accurate, intelligent, fact based look at our creation of terrorism for regime change. Others see it. How long can he look forward with blinders on to criminality?

In his speech he tried to justify regime change for “democracy creation.” I guess he does not care much about a nation's sovereignty in regards to self determination. Regime change is justified. Through his words and actions, what protects our sovereignty when we protect criminals involved in the creation of terrorism?

Pretty much nothing, if the case can be made and no one in the US calls these criminals out in a public court of law. Eventually Europe and the rest of the world will tire of facing the repercussions of our criminal actions. Now Germany will be hosting nuclear weapons to thwart the “Russian threat.” I wonder if this is in retaliation for their turn in support for Russia in its fight against ISIS? Perhaps the power men have a way to hold Germany hostage.

As president Obama said, “On this basis, we see some major powers assert themselves in ways that contravene international law. We see an erosion of democratic principles and human rights that are fundamental to this institution's mission, information is strictly controlled, the space for civil society restricted. We're told that such retrenchment is required to beat back disorder; that it's the only way to stamp out terrorism, or prevent foreign meddling." This statement could have been written by looking in the mirror when you think about Sovereignty of nations in regards to international law, the erosion of US democracy as we are now a basic oligarchy, using spying, torture, cooked evidence and planted hoax stories to justify our cause. It is a sad day indeed when the world can see so clearly the emperor has no clothes, just nukes and weapons trying to create Sustainable Development.

If you would like to watch the speaches, click here.

Watching as the Cuban flag was raised at the Cuban Embassy in Washington D.C. presents a mixed blessing for those who are from Cuban heritage, as I am. My mom escaped from Cuba in 1961. She barely got out when Fidel Castro took over. And while my mom and I are happy to see relations normalizing with Cuba, something seems missing. What is missing is the story of those who escaped and lost everything due to the revolution. This happened to the many people who were not rich but rather middle class, like most people here in America.

Everything was taken from them. Their personal belongings and homes were taken. They were then moved to the country from Havana to work on farms. How strange it must have been for my mother, an office worker, and my grandmother, a teacher, to be moved from their home as all of their belongings were taken over, and then they were bused to the countryside.

What is eerie to watch are the numerous socialists and others lauding only the advancement of the people of Cuba. This happened on the backs of many middle class people who found themselves lucky enough to escape Cuba with one suitcase and a hidden photo or two.

Castro and the rest of the revolutionaries were given license to steal by both the poor and potentially the same corrupt elite which they claimed to be against. They have controlled those poor into their present reality. And while the socialist system has yielded lots of benefits including health care, education, housing, etc., there is little of free enterprise with the exception of the black market which is used to supplement the average Cuban's income. There is no freedom to speak against the system, freedom of expression is limited and the revolutionaries needed to push common people down to achieve their goal which they now say is justified based on the results.

There is a much better solution than this manufactured socialist system, which is being lauded. It is found in the true and enforced meaning of the Bill of Rights in the US and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

What if the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion really failed on purpose? One thing that my mom could never understand is how Castro managed to stay in power all of those years. She never understood how the world's most powerful government could not remove the dictator and free the Cuban people. It seemed so clear and easy to do, and yet it never made sense that this was not done. So, perhaps the blockade was intentional to show the “benefits” of socialism. All the while, the corrupt version of  the “free enterprise system” was operating in the background with visits to Cuba from prominent, well financed Americans including Mitt Romney.

When one of my friends on Facebook posted a quote by a Russian Think Tank Strategist, Konstantin Sivkov, who said that “The best way for Russia to solve its problem with America would be to trigger a nuclear weapon at Yellowstone National Park and hope it would set off a supervolcano, destroying the continent,” according to several articles including this one http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/russian-strategist-suggests-nuking-yellowstone/, I had to wonder – do they think they have nothing to do with the American foreign policy situation? Could they have put an end to the Bush Administration with the evidence they have about 9/11/2001? Steel buildings do not collapse because of fire even when jet fuel is added. The temperature does not get hot enough.

This reminded me when I was working at the Taste of Encino during the 2004 election cycle. At the time Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a big topic in Russia, and I was talking with a Republican campaign chair about the democracy movement in Russia and what was happening to Khodorkovsky. At the time, I felt like we were being listened to. Well, within about 15 minutes of our conversation, two guys with Russian accents show up and come in between our conversation. One goes with the Republican chair and purchases the largest Bush/Cheney sign I have ever seen.

The other guy stays and talks with me while their campaign contribution is made. When thinking about the Russian strategy through out the Bush Administration, it has been one of watch the Administration make global mistakes and potentially allow criminal actions to happen for later use. Currently my views on Khodorkovsky have changed because of Ukraine, but this does not eliminate Russian culpability with the foreign policy that is currently affecting them – NATO's encroachment.

If Russia had stood against the US and offered evidence on 9/11/2001 – satellite photos, scientific reports and analysis regarding who the culprits were, would there be NATO encroachment today? Why suggest killing thousands of Americans, Canadians and Mexicans because of what is a continuation of a potentially unfairly elected leader's fault (the Supreme Court made Bush President), yes, but if Russia as a country had the power to stop imperialism based on lies many years ago, why did they not? Could there be a benefit to watching America fail – financially and diplomatically – launching false wars and committing financial crimes? Are the citizens to blame when no one in the world seems to be able to stop what seems to be organized crime operating within a country's boarders? And no one internationally – or rather very few- are willing to stand up and speak against it.

It was interesting when Gordon Duff asked President Vladimir Putin for evidence connecting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Soviet Intelligence in an article titled, “We Demand: President Putin Release Documents Vital to World Peace.” http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/10/we-demand-president-putin-release-documents-vital-to-world-peace/

He asked for, “Full information on Netanyahu’s role in running Jonathan Pollard as a Soviet agent,” and “Full information on Netanyahu’s role as a Soviet agent in the theft of American cryptographic units from the UNTSO in 1990 and the nature of the data, NATO military secrets, US State Department correspondence and US Naval codes that Netanyahu passed on to Moscow.”

Thinking about the Bolsheviks, their origins and the Khazarian mafia there is a possible reason no one spoke about 9/11/2001. They all potentially benefited. Previously, one could give them a pass because globally the narrative against speaking out has been so strong and looking at Think Tanks, they are typically hot heads, hawks and war profiteers, so that may be why there was little interest in bringing organized crime on trial for possibly committing one of the largest terror incidents that led to countless wars, killing well over one million people. Now looking at Mr. Sivkov's statement, one would also have to wonder as he was present in Russia during the Soviet Union, could he also be aware of the Khazarian mafia? Why threaten us and not them, as it is possible that they are the basis for the situation in Ukraine?

Perhaps it is a Think Tank problem similar to the Bomb, Bomb Iran crowd here in the US – they refuse to see themselves as the problem. The other side of the coin is the American Think Tanks providing wonderful opinion pieces to the New York Times, especial the one written by Former Ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, now Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, entitled, “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran.” http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/26/opinion/to-stop-irans-bomb-bomb-iran.html

With the painstaking work done by the Obama Administration to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, words of Mr. Bolton are not constructive. They are detrimental.

“The inconvenient truth is that only military action like Israel’s 1981 attack on Saddam Hussein’s Osirak reactor in Iraq or its 2007 destruction of a Syrian reactor, designed and built by North Korea, can accomplish what is required,” said Bolton. What would that accomplish? The Apocalypse? Inspections over Armageddon for all including Israel is a better choice until the world reaches a point where nuclear power is no longer a profitable, viable form of power – which could be very soon if E-cat, hydrogen power and other alternatives were allowed to take the stage.

Notice how this is not ever brought up. Rather to bomb, destroy or nuke the planet rather than create solutions that are viable and solid. Perhaps we should change the name Think Tanks to Nuke Tanks, perhaps then and only then would we be clear of what these fools are after.